The Langelinie tower could become one of Copenhagen’s most visible new buildings, after plans for a 120-metre residential high-rise at the tip of Langelinie gained political support at Copenhagen City Hall. The project would add 240 homes to one of the capital’s most symbolic waterfront areas, while reopening a debate over how high Copenhagen should build and how much its harbour skyline should change.
The proposal, presented by the landowners behind the Harbour P/S development company, would replace an older office-led plan for the site with a residential project made up of two towers and a connecting lower structure. The highest tower would reach 120 metres, matching Pasteurs Tårn in Carlsbergbyen, currently one of Copenhagen’s tallest residential buildings. A second, lower tower of about 63 metres would contain the project’s social housing units.

A 120-metre tower would change Copenhagen’s harbour skyline
The new Langelinie tower would stand at the outer tip of Langelinie, close to the entrance between Langelinie and Marmormolen. According to visualisations prepared by Vilhelm Lauritzen Architects, Lendager and STED By & Landskab, the building would be visible from several parts of Copenhagen, including Fælledparken and other open urban spaces where the city’s harbour profile can be seen from a distance.
That visibility is central to the political and architectural debate. Copenhagen has traditionally avoided a dense high-rise skyline in its historic centre, relying instead on a low urban fabric punctuated by towers, church spires, industrial structures and a limited number of newer high buildings. A 120-metre residential tower at Langelinie would therefore not only add homes. It would also become part of the city’s long-term visual identity.
The project’s architects describe the proposed towers as slender and open silhouettes designed to reduce the visual weight of the development and connect with the surrounding harbour landscape. The argument is that a slim tower can leave more room at ground level for public space, trees and recreational uses than a lower but bulkier building.

The Langelinie project includes homes, social housing and public space
The development would include 240 homes across about 31,000 square metres of floor space. Around 70 of the homes would be social housing, equivalent to about 29 percent of the total. They are expected to be located in the lower tower and taken over by Boligselskabet AKB København, part of the KAB housing organisation.
The remaining homes would mainly be owner-occupied apartments. The balance between private and social housing is politically important in Copenhagen, where rising housing costs have made affordability one of the city’s most persistent urban challenges. Supporters of the plan argue that building on a long-unused harbour site can help add housing supply while securing a share of non-profit homes in an area that would otherwise be dominated by expensive private development.
The ground level is expected to include functions such as cafés, shops or restaurants. The plan also includes approximately 1,000 bicycle parking spaces and 130 car parking spaces. According to the project material reported by Danish media, the local plan would also require 340 new trees and 489 shrubs, with a tree canopy target of around 25 percent after roughly 15 years and potentially more in the longer term.

Political support does not end the Copenhagen high-rise debate
The project appears to have support from a political majority at Copenhagen City Hall, but it still depends on the local planning process. A new local plan is expected to be sent to public consultation before the summer holidays, meaning residents, organisations and other stakeholders will still be able to submit objections or comments.
The proposal has already drawn concern from neighbours and architecture commentators. Critics fear that a tower of this height could disturb one of Copenhagen’s most recognisable waterfront settings, particularly because Langelinie is closely linked to the city’s maritime history, cruise traffic, the nearby Kastellet area and the route toward the Little Mermaid.
The debate is not only about one building. It is also about the direction of Copenhagen’s development. As the city grows, pressure to build more homes is increasing, but high-rise construction remains controversial in a capital whose attractiveness is partly tied to its human scale, historic rooflines and relatively low profile.

Marmormolen and Langelinie could form a new harbour gateway
The Langelinie proposal is connected to a wider transformation around Marmormolen and Nordhavn. On the opposite side of the harbour entrance, the same landowner group is working on Lodshusene, a project that includes a new city park and a commercial building at Marmormolen.
Together, the projects would create a new built gateway around the harbour entrance. This idea has a long history. An earlier local plan was based on a project by Steven Holl Architects, which proposed two high-rises on Marmormolen and Langelinie connected by a bridge. That plan was never realised. The new proposal abandons the bridge and shifts the Langelinie site toward housing rather than offices.
The landowners behind Harbour P/S are PensionDanmark Ejendomme, ATP Ejendomme and By & Havn, the publicly owned urban development company that has played a central role in Copenhagen’s harbour transformation. Their involvement gives the project a broader institutional dimension: this is not a small private development, but part of the city’s wider port redevelopment strategy.

Copenhagen’s tallest homes are becoming less exceptional
If approved, the 120-metre Langelinie tower would stand alongside Pasteurs Tårn in Carlsbergbyen as one of Copenhagen’s highest residential buildings. It would remain lower than Lighthouse in Aarhus, which reaches 142 metres, but it would be among the most prominent high-rise housing projects in the Danish capital.
Other tall residential buildings in Copenhagen and the surrounding area, including Postbyen, Domus Vista, Bohrs Tårn and Nordbro, have already changed expectations about building height. Yet Langelinie is a more sensitive location than many newer development zones because of its symbolic waterfront position and its exposure in long views across the city.
For that reason, the local planning process is likely to focus not only on housing numbers and architectural design, but also on public access, climate impact, biodiversity and the relationship between new construction and Copenhagen’s harbour identity.
The proposal now moves into a political and public phase. If the local plan is adopted, Copenhagen could gain a new high-rise landmark at Langelinie. If opposition grows, the project may become another test of how far the city is willing to go in balancing housing needs, public space and the preservation of its low-rise urban character.





