Politics

Norway is spending more to restore nature

Norway nature restoration projects will receive a record NOK 43.6 million, about €4 million, in 2026, as the Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) increases support for local work to repair degraded ecosystems across the country.

The funding will go to 61 projects selected from 154 applications submitted by municipalities, county authorities, organisations, private landowners and other project owners. The total amount requested reached NOK 111.7 million, about €10.2 million, showing a sharp increase in demand for public support for nature repair.

A record year for Norway nature restoration funding

The Norwegian Environment Agency said this year’s allocation is the largest so far under the grant scheme for nature restoration, which supports both planning and implementation of restoration measures.

The programme is designed to help local actors restore damaged or altered ecosystems, including wetlands, rivers, streams, coastal landscapes and cultural landscapes. In practice, the supported projects range from reopening streams and removing old roads to restoring peatlands and clearing invasive species.

According to the agency, roughly one third of the 2026 applications came from municipalities and county authorities. The rest came from private individuals, organisations and other local project owners. That distribution matters because many restoration projects depend on local knowledge, land ownership and long-term maintenance after the first intervention has been completed.

The rise in applications also suggests that the grant scheme is becoming more widely known. Last year, the total amount requested was NOK 38 million, about €3.5 million. In 2026, the requested amount almost tripled, reaching NOK 111.7 million. The agency also had more money available this year because of lower spending in 2025, leaving more than NOK 30 million, about €2.7 million, to be allocated in 2026.

Rivers, peatlands and coastal habitats receive targeted support

The largest share of the funding will go to projects linked to rivers and streams, which receive NOK 12.3 million, about €1.1 million. These measures may include reopening waterways, improving habitats for fish and other species, and reversing past interventions that altered natural water flows.

Peatland restoration will receive NOK 11.2 million, about €1 million. This is significant because peatlands are important for biodiversity, water regulation and carbon storage. Restoring degraded mires can help retain water in the landscape and reduce the release of stored carbon, while also improving habitats for specialised plants, birds and insects.

Another NOK 11.8 million, about €1.1 million, will support the clearing and management of cultural landscapes. In Norway, as in other Nordic countries, many semi-natural landscapes depend on continued management, such as grazing, clearing of overgrowth and the removal of invasive or unsuitable tree species. Without this work, habitats shaped by traditional land use can disappear.

Marine restoration projects will receive NOK 4.2 million, about €385,000, while NOK 4 million, about €366,000, will go to other types of nature measures. The projects include work in different habitat types, reflecting the broad definition of restoration used by the scheme.

Local projects reflect a wider biodiversity challenge

The Norwegian grants are relatively small compared with large infrastructure or climate budgets, but they reflect a policy shift that is becoming more visible across Europe: protecting nature is no longer seen only as a matter of setting land aside, but also of repairing ecosystems that have already been damaged.

Norway is not a member of the European Union, but its environmental policy is closely linked to European and international frameworks. At global level, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework calls for at least 30 percent of degraded terrestrial, inland water, coastal and marine ecosystems to be under effective restoration by 2030.

The EU has also moved in the same direction through its Nature Restoration Regulation, a legally binding framework intended to restore degraded ecosystems across member states. While Norway is outside the EU, the policy debate is highly relevant for the wider Nordic region, where land use, hydropower, forestry, agriculture and climate change all affect ecosystems.

Norway’s own biodiversity strategy has also placed stronger emphasis on knowledge, ecosystem condition and long-term management. Local restoration grants are one practical tool in that wider effort, especially when they support projects that can be maintained by municipalities, landowners and civil society.

Why repairing nature is becoming a Nordic policy issue

The 2026 allocation shows how nature restoration in Norway is moving from specialist environmental policy into local planning and public funding. The high number of applications indicates that many communities see damaged nature not only as an ecological problem, but also as a local development issue.

Restored streams can reduce flood risk and improve urban environments. Healthy peatlands can support climate adaptation and biodiversity. Managed cultural landscapes can preserve habitats, local identity and traditional land-use patterns. Coastal and marine projects can strengthen ecosystems that are under pressure from pollution, infrastructure and changing sea conditions.

The main challenge will be scale. NOK 43.6 million is a record amount for the scheme, but the level of demand shows that many more projects could be carried out if more funding were available. The gap between applications and approved grants also suggests that restoration has become an area where local ambition is growing faster than national budgets.

For Norway and the Nordic region, the question is now whether these local projects remain isolated interventions or become part of a broader restoration strategy. The 2026 grants mark a larger step than previous years, but the long-term impact will depend on whether restored habitats are monitored, maintained and connected to wider climate and biodiversity goals.

Shares:

Related Posts