Several Copenhagen schools are publicly opposing the Danish Parliament’s recent decision to exclude the topic of Palestinian statehood from next year’s school election debates. Contrary to the stance taken by the Folketingets Præsidium (Parliamentary Presidium), these schools argue that conversations about the Israel-Palestine conflict are not only possible but necessary within the classroom.
Copenhagen school defends open dialogue
One of the schools at the centre of the discussion is Nørrebro Park Skole, located in the Nørrebro district of Copenhagen. In an interview with Jyllands-Posten, headteacher John Nielsen stated, “It is more dangerous to silence the students. That is when the conflict truly becomes a problem.” Nielsen emphasized that the issue is already being addressed in some classes, and the school has not faced any disruptions as a result.
Background on the Parliament’s decision
The controversy follows the decision by the Folketingets Præsidium to remove the topic “Recognise Palestine as an independent state” from the agenda of the 2026 school elections. The move was framed as a way to avoid politicizing schools or inflaming tensions among students, particularly in urban areas with diverse populations.

Teachers highlight importance of inclusion
Educators at schools with significant ethnic minority student populations—such as Nørrebro Park Skole, where around 40% of students have a non-Danish ethnic background—stress the need for inclusive, guided discussions on global issues. They argue that suppressing discourse does not prevent conflict but rather breeds ignorance and division.
The educators’ perspective aligns with broader educational goals that encourage critical thinking, dialogue, and civic engagement. By engaging students in structured discussions about controversial topics, schools can offer a safe environment to explore different viewpoints and foster mutual understanding.
Wider implications for educational policy
The incident has sparked a broader debate on the role of schools in addressing political issues. While the Folketingets Præsidium aims to maintain neutrality, schools like Nørrebro Park argue that neutrality should not equate to silence. Instead, they advocate for constructive engagement that equips students to navigate complex global conflicts with empathy and knowledge.
As tensions persist in the Middle East and solidarity movements gain visibility across Europe, the question of how educational institutions handle such topics is likely to remain contentious. In Denmark, the response from schools indicates a clear pushback against top-down restrictions in favour of open, inclusive education.